A consistent fire risk assessment programme across your whole portfolio, one format, one review schedule, one point of contact. Every site walked by Kevin or Jon, never a junior or subcontractor.
Managing agents carry the responsible-person duty for the common parts of dozens of buildings at once, blocks of flats, mixed-use, commercial and HMOs, each with its own deadlines, its own demarcation between you and the leaseholders or tenants, and its own enforcement exposure.
The risk is rarely a single bad assessment. It is a portfolio where every site uses a different assessor and a different format, review dates are tracked on a spreadsheet that has drifted, and actions sit open because no one owns them to closure.
Clear Fire gives managing agents a single, consistent assessment programme, the same format and methodology across every site, a shared schedule that flags renewals before they lapse, and Kevin or Jon walking each building personally.
Drawn from Kevin and Jon's combined assessment experience managing multi-site programmes. The recurring issues are about consistency, ownership and the gaps between parties.
Every building assessed by a different firm to a different template, making it impossible to compare risk or report to clients consistently.
Unclear boundaries between the common-parts duty (you) and the demised spaces (leaseholders/tenants), leaving parts of a building assessed by nobody.
No central schedule, so assessments lapse unnoticed and a site is found out of date at the worst possible moment.
Significant findings raised in previous assessments still open months later, with no audit trail of remediation.
Assessments, certificates and action plans scattered across inboxes rather than held in one accessible place per building.
A patchwork of assessors of unknown competence across the portfolio, creating uneven and sometimes indefensible reports.
Newly taken-on buildings with no current assessment, or missing history, and no quick way to bring them up to standard.
Blocks that fall under the Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 or the Building Safety Act's higher-risk regime not identified or treated accordingly.
Every building in your portfolio is assessed to the same methodology and delivered in the same signed-PDF format, a one-page management summary, photographic evidence stitched to each finding, and a downloadable evidence appendix.
Findings are prioritised against the PAS 79-1 / BS 9792 likelihood-and-consequence matrix into four bands with indicative remediation windows, so you can report risk consistently across the whole portfolio and track every action to closure.
Kevin was superb in responding quickly when asked to step in and replace an inadequate fire risk assessment delivered by another firm.
For clients with several buildings, we run every site to one report format, one assessor relationship and one annual review cycle, so your responsible person and insurer see a consistent evidence trail across the whole portfolio.
Tell us about the portfolio and we'll come back within one working hour with a consistent programme, schedule and pricing. Kevin or Jon on every site, reports within 24 hours of invoice paid.
Kevin and Jon are happy to give you a straight answer before you book, no sales pitch, just plain advice.
Speak to an owner →Tell us about your site. We'll respond within one working hour during business hours.